i have always wondered what the origin of the universe was like. Actually i was even more perplexed about why there is a universe at all. Later on, i realized this might be akin to imposing a human trait of looking for meaning and purpose on a inanimate entity.
that said, the process as we claim to know it today is itself highly fascinating. The details aside, the common theme i find of great interest to me is the specifi-cation. The process of becoming from being. Change from constancy. Evolving from uniformity to lumpiness. whatever might have been the theoretical observations about specific details of first three minutes of the universe's life; i always thought of it as something very highly uniform giving way to something lot less uniform. In essence, the formation of energy and mass and localized concepts. I picture in my limited imagination the universe before time as a vast pool of being - unperturbed by any wrinkle. Then for some unknown reason or no reason at all, the wrinkles form. Interesting, neither space nor time are relevant in a universe made of uniformity. Because time is relevant only when change in some frame of reference or other is observable. Likewise, space is relevant only when distinct lumps are separated from each other and "location" has a meaning.
The evolution thereafter can thus be looked at as more and more specification. Energy came together to form mass and then smaller particles came together to form larger ones - later on atoms of small elements and then heavier elements - albeit lot more sparsely populated across the universe.
As of now, we could still be moving to heavier and more localized universe. To be precise earth in itself is a fairly dense object by universal standards of hydrogen and helium dominated stars. On earth again, much of the minerals are some of the heaviest elements in existence.
The universe seems to be already moving from hydrogen to helium. As fas as i know of star physics, i think the red giants, neutron stars and such later stages in stars' lives are necessarily of a heavier variety.
Leaving that line of thought aside, there is an interesting discussion elsewhere. Another direction in which the universe seems to be evolving is the complexity of its constituents. Of course it ties in well with the moving from uniformity to the specificity. however, over and above that, the universe is also seeing highly localized phenomena of self conscious beings like humans. Now i would not have had a very significant opinion of the species had it not been for the considerable change in their habitat that they have brought about. Earth has been altered a lot by human beings and i believe so will be the solar system in next 100 years or so.
on the optimistic side i can say this is beginning of the new age for the universe. it is the age of conscious beings altering the face of the universe over time. While obeying the laws of nature, going towards lower entropy in specific pockets. What i mean is that entropy as a whole is going to increase and that is a given. However, in our limited lifetimes, what we end up doing is altering the impact of entropy increase from what it would have been in its natural uniterrupted course of action to what it is because of human intervention. Simplest thing is our cities. The houses and streets and other things with it are not likely to be the result of any natural phenomena. Definitely not at the scale at which we have them. Of course while building the order in the cities, we do create a lot of disorder in the energy spent of building them and maintaining them. The entropy as a whole does go up. However, the path is altered. There is a pocket of system we have managed to create in the middle of disorder.
All the history of human civilization has been this creation of order amidst diffusion and disorder. The disorder is in some sense the natural way of the universe - it indicates uniformity at its own level. The next stage of universe's evolution seems aided by conscious being through their efforts to create a better surrounding for themselves.
Saturday, January 26, 2008
Friday, December 21, 2007
efficacy of the role of education in poverty alleviation
education can be a powerful tool to alleviate poverty in medium term. It is not very obvious in the short term but in the medium term it is one of the surer ways to move out of poverty for a family. Education makes more valuable the only resource poor have in ample measure at their disposal - their labor.
The issue however is that the education is a fairly long term investment. Also poor often are reluctant to let go of the current returns on the labor in return for a better though riskier returns later.
Is there a market mechanism to get the poor to balance this risk as a family?
The issue however is that the education is a fairly long term investment. Also poor often are reluctant to let go of the current returns on the labor in return for a better though riskier returns later.
Is there a market mechanism to get the poor to balance this risk as a family?
Sunday, November 25, 2007
so what does one aspire to be?
I did not see it that clearly earlier. The use of lack of it for money. I still believe that money wont get you everything. But now that i have looked into how to help people manage their money, i have increasingly gotten over my other belief that a lot of money can help you bring about a lasting impact on the human civilization.
Money does not suffice. The organization of human society is much too complex for that. If you are enterprising, money will come to you. If you take sufficient risks, money could come to you in great measure as well. However, if you are under the impression that this will solve most of your problems, you would be in for a surprise. Why is that? All moral judgments aside, money is after all a medium to express your purchasing power, it does not point to any solutions. Solutions to? Well, to start with, how to you make sense of your existence, what do you aspire for in life, what do you hold close to your heart, how do you be happy?
Money will not affect it negatively either. It simply has a much limited role to play. Somehow the collective conscious being driven by a large mass of have-nots has led us to value money much more that it is truly worth.
To lead a good life, i will need lot more focus on trying to lead a good life than just collecting enough resources to get there. A lot of thought needs to go into how to make the life interesting, fulfilling and long-lasting. This needs physical, mental and social health as a hygiene factor. Over and above that you need a bit of luck but more importantly, a lot of focus and thoughtfulness. How you handle small matters as well as large will have a lasting impact on what life gives you back. Of course taking it all too seriously may erode the fun anyway. But that said, it is no excuse for letting life just happen to you!
Money does not suffice. The organization of human society is much too complex for that. If you are enterprising, money will come to you. If you take sufficient risks, money could come to you in great measure as well. However, if you are under the impression that this will solve most of your problems, you would be in for a surprise. Why is that? All moral judgments aside, money is after all a medium to express your purchasing power, it does not point to any solutions. Solutions to? Well, to start with, how to you make sense of your existence, what do you aspire for in life, what do you hold close to your heart, how do you be happy?
Money will not affect it negatively either. It simply has a much limited role to play. Somehow the collective conscious being driven by a large mass of have-nots has led us to value money much more that it is truly worth.
To lead a good life, i will need lot more focus on trying to lead a good life than just collecting enough resources to get there. A lot of thought needs to go into how to make the life interesting, fulfilling and long-lasting. This needs physical, mental and social health as a hygiene factor. Over and above that you need a bit of luck but more importantly, a lot of focus and thoughtfulness. How you handle small matters as well as large will have a lasting impact on what life gives you back. Of course taking it all too seriously may erode the fun anyway. But that said, it is no excuse for letting life just happen to you!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)